Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYang, Tingzhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdullah, Abu Saleh M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRockett, Ian R Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Muen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Yuhuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMa, Junen_US
dc.contributor.authorJi, Huapingen_US
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Jianzhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Limingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-11T22:26:04Z
dc.date.available2012-01-11T22:26:04Z
dc.date.copyright2011
dc.date.issued2010-9-21
dc.identifier.citationYang, Tingzhong, Abu Saleh M. Abdullah, Ian R H Rockett, Mu Li, Yuhua Zhou, Jun Ma, Huaping Ji, Jianzhong Zheng, Yuhong Zhang, Liming Wang. "Assessment of tobacco control advocacy behavioural capacity among students at schools of public health in China" Tobacco Control 20(1): 20-25. (2010)
dc.identifier.issn1468-3318
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/3287
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES. To evaluate student tobacco control advocacy behavioural capacity using longitudinal trace data. METHODS. A tobacco control advocacy curriculum was developed and implemented at schools of public health (SPH) or departments of public health in seven universities in China. Participants comprised undergraduate students studying the public health curriculum in these 13 Universities. A standardised assessment tool was used to evaluate their tobacco control advocacy behavioural capacity. Repeated measures analysis of variance, paired t tests and paired ?2 tests were used to determine differences between dependent variables across time. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess treatment effects between intervention and control sites. RESULTS. Respective totals of 426 students in the intervention group and 338 in the control group were available for the evaluation. Approximately 90% of respondents were aged 21 years or older and 56% were women. Findings show that the capacity building program significantly improved public health student advocacy behavioural capacity, including advocacy attitude, interest, motivation and anti-secondhand smoke behaviours. The curriculum did not impact student smoking behaviour. CONCLUSIONS. This study provides sufficient evidence to support the implementation of tobacco control advocacy training at Chinese schools of public health.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease(U-China-1-15)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Groupen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.en_US
dc.subjectTobacco controlen_US
dc.subjectAdvocacyen_US
dc.subjectBehavioural capacity, undergraduate studentsen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectCessationen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental tobacco smokeen_US
dc.subjectYoung adultsen_US
dc.titleAssessment of Tobacco Control Advocacy Behavioural Capacity among Students at Schools of Public Health in Chinaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tc.2010.036590
dc.identifier.pmid20861004
dc.identifier.pmcid3003866


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record