Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Shaneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSen, Kamalen_US
dc.contributor.authorKopell, Nancyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-11T00:40:41Z
dc.date.available2012-01-11T00:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-11
dc.identifier.citationLee, Shane, Kamal Sen, Nancy Kopell. "Cortical Gamma Rhythms Modulate NMDAR-Mediated Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity in a Biophysical Model" PLos Computational Biology 5(12): e1000602. (2009)
dc.identifier.issn1553-7358
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/3042
dc.description.abstractSpike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) has been observed experimentally in vitro and is a widely studied neural algorithm for synaptic modification. While the functional role of STDP has been investigated extensively, the effect of rhythms on the precise timing of STDP has not been characterized as well. We use a simplified biophysical model of a cortical network that generates pyramidal interneuronal gamma rhythms (PING). Plasticity via STDP is investigated at the excitatory pyramidal cell synapse from a gamma frequency (30–90 Hz) input independent of the network gamma rhythm. The input may represent a corticocortical or an information-specific thalamocortical connection. This synapse is mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mediated (NMDAR) currents. For distinct network and input frequencies, the model shows robust frequency regimes of potentiation and depression, providing a mechanism by which responses to certain inputs can potentiate while responses to other inputs depress. For potentiating regimes, the model suggests an optimal amount and duration of plasticity that can occur, which depends on the time course for the decay of the postsynaptic NMDAR current. Prolonging the duration of the input beyond this optimal time results in depression. Inserting pauses in the input can increase the total potentiation. The optimal pause length corresponds to the decay time of the NMDAR current. Thus, STDP in this model provides a mechanism for potentiation and depression depending on input frequency and suggests that the slow NMDAR current decay helps to regulate the optimal amplitude and duration of the plasticity. The optimal pause length is comparable to the time scale of the negative phase of a modulatory theta rhythm, which may pause gamma rhythm spiking. Our pause results may suggest a novel role for this theta rhythm in plasticity. Finally, we discuss our results in the context of auditory thalamocortical plasticity. Author Summary Rhythms are well studied phenomena in many animal species. Brain rhythms in the gamma frequency range (30–90 Hz) are thought to play a role in attention and memory. In this paper, we are interested in how cortical gamma rhythms interact with information specific inputs that also have a significant gamma frequency component. The results from our computational model show that plasticity associated with learning depends on the specific frequencies of the input and cortical gamma rhythms. The results show a mechanism by which both increases and decreases in the strength of the input connection can occur, depending on the specific frequency of the input. A current mediated by NMDA receptors may be responsible for the temporal course of the plasticity seen in these brain regions. We discuss the implications of our results for conditioning paradigms applied to auditory learning.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Deafness and Communication Disorders (RO1 DC-007610 - 01A1); National Institues of Health (T32 MH020064-07, T32 MH020064-08); National Science Foundation (DMS-0602204, EMSW21-RTG)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsLee et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.titleCortical Gamma Rhythms Modulate NMDAR-Mediated Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity in a Biophysical Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000602
dc.identifier.pmid20011119
dc.identifier.pmcid2782132


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record