A Web-Based Alcohol Clinical Training (ACT) Curriculum: Is In-Person Faculty Development Necessary to Affect Teaching?
dc.contributor.author | Alford, Daniel P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, Jessica M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chapman, Sheila E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dubé, Catherine E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schadt, Robert W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Saitz, Richard | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-12-29T21:02:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-12-29T21:02:15Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-3-6 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alford, Daniel P, Jessica M Richardson, Sheila E Chapman, Catherine E Dubé, Robert W Schadt, Richard Saitz. "A web-based Alcohol Clinical Training (ACT) curriculum: Is in-person faculty development necessary to affect teaching?" BMC Medical Education 8:11. (2008) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6920 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2144/2495 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Physicians receive little education about unhealthy alcohol use and as a result patients often do not receive efficacious interventions. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether a free web-based alcohol curriculum would be used by physician educators and whether in-person faculty development would increase its use, confidence in teaching and teaching itself. METHODS: Subjects were physician educators who applied to attend a workshop on the use of a web-based curriculum about alcohol screening and brief intervention and cross-cultural efficacy. All physicians were provided the curriculum web address. Intervention subjects attended a 3-hour workshop including demonstration of the website, modeling of teaching, and development of a plan for using the curriculum. All subjects completed a survey prior to and 3 months after the workshop. RESULTS: Of 20 intervention and 13 control subjects, 19 (95%) and 10 (77%), respectively, completed follow-up. Compared to controls, intervention subjects had greater increases in confidence in teaching alcohol screening, and in the frequency of two teaching practices – teaching about screening and eliciting patient health beliefs. Teaching confidence and teaching practices improved significantly in 9 of 10 comparisons for intervention, and in 0 comparisons for control subjects. At follow-up 79% of intervention but only 50% of control subjects reported using any part of the curriculum (p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: In-person training for physician educators on the use of a web-based alcohol curriculum can increase teaching confidence and practices. Although the web is frequently used for disemination, in-person training may be preferable to effect widespread teaching of clinical skills like alcohol screening and brief intervention. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | US National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R24 AA13822) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright 2008 Alford et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 | |
dc.title | A Web-Based Alcohol Clinical Training (ACT) Curriculum: Is In-Person Faculty Development Necessary to Affect Teaching? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1472-6920-8-11 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18325102 | |
dc.identifier.pmcid | 2329623 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2008 Alford et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.